Most grandmothers do not live like this or have a budget of millions for the upkeep of their house nor need more millions to fix the plumbing. I am no longer a royal fan when I see such extravagance. Too many hanger-on too - such a huge staff. Turn Grandma Elizabeth's house into a museum to recover the costs of fixing and let the family go to one or other of their many homes.
Queen Elizabeth might have to leave crumbling Buckingham Palace
Moving out? The Queen (right) waves from the balcony of Buckingham Palace with (from left) Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, Prince Charles, Prince George and Prince William. Photo: AFP
Maintenance required: Tourists take a selfie in front of Buckingham Palace. Photo: Getty Images
London: The Queen might have to move out of Buckingham Palace for an extended period under plans being considered to allow builders to carry out millions of pounds of repairs to the crumbling building.
The 300-year-old palace needs about £150 million ($306 million) worth of work to fix the roofs and replace old wiring, ancient decorating and dated plumbing, a royal source said on Wednesday.
Although no decision is imminent as funding has yet to be agreed, the royals who use the palace as a London base, including the Queen and some of her children, might have to move out as well if that is the most cost-effective solution.
Advertisement
"It is one of a number of potential options as we take forward the essential maintenance of the palace," the royal source said.
If she does have to move out, the Queen has several official residences to choose from, including Windsor Castle west of London, Sandringham House in Norfolk, Holyrood Palace in Edinburgh and Balmoral Castle further north in Scotland.
Buckingham Palace has 775 rooms including 52 royal and guest bedrooms and 188 bedrooms for staff. It was bought by King George III for his wife Queen Charlotte and has served as the official London residence of Britain's monarchs since 1837.
In January 2014, legislators accused the royal household of neglecting repairs at the palace, saying its electrical wiring and boilers were at least 60 years old and it had asbestos that needed to be removed.
"We will look carefully at all the options and the cost implications before taking any decisions," a palace spokeswoman said.
Official figures on Wednesday showed the 89-year-old Queen, who will overtake Queen Victoria as Britain's longest-reigning monarch in September, spent £35.7 million ($73 million) in the last financial year. Public funding for the monarch will increase to almost £43 million ($88 million) next year.
"The Queen, the royal family and the household continue to provide excellent value for money: at 56p [pence] per person annually," said the Queen's treasurer Alan Reid, known as the Keeper of the Privy Purse.
Republican campaigners estimate the annual cost of the monarchy to the taxpayer to be £334 million ($682 million), taking into account issues such as security charges. They say the royal family should move out of the palace permanently if they could not afford its upkeep.
"The Tower of London does well as a world-class tourist attraction, paying for its own upkeep," said Graham Smith, chief executive of the anti-monarchy group Republic. "Buckingham Palace would make a great tourist destination – if the royals moved out."
No comments:
Post a Comment