Tuesday, January 01, 2013

Fiji a Christian or secular state

from w
In the version of the draft constitution I read (some say an illegally obtained version) the idea of Fiji being called a Christian state is not accepted despite a lot of lobbying by various people.  The regime made a stipulant that Fiji should be a secular state and Professor Ghai's group went along with that.  However  some people are still not happy about the word 'secular' as indicated in the following letter to the Editor of the Fiji Times today, and I think it is a good letter.  Then below I have posted the relevant part in the proposed constitution which is now in the public domain, whether officially sanctioned or not. The horse has bolted!


Christianity secularism
AS the debate on Fiji to be a secular State rather than a Christian State continues, I am of the belief that the latter is more appropriate and justifiable than the former on the following basis.
We must admit that the good life we have in Fiji today compared with many nations and countries of the world is undoubtedly the making and influence of our former leaders, most of whom were Christians who led our nation during the colonial era and later grazed our politically landscape during and after independence.
That the majority of our present population are Christians and should justifiably uphold the proposition for the Christian State as majority in decision-making is one of the pillars of the principles of democratic system.
However, in the process, making provision in the constitution to safeguard the freedom of religion without imposing the Christian faith or any other faith for that matter to anyone should always be part of the constitution.
For a secular State, the word secular, which means not religious or not spiritual, certainly makes it wrong and unacceptable to call Fiji as such.
In fact what it would mean is that Fiji or the Fijians would not recognise or acknowledge the religious or spiritual aspects of man's life in the highest governing law of our nation and that is disastrous.
Man, as we should know, is a tripartite being composed of the spiritual soul and body. When we want to employ the word secular, in essence what we will be saying or doing is denying God, the religious or spiritual part of our being and will not augur well with our present and future existence. We will just need to seriously consider nations — that only in the past decades adopted the philosophy of non-existence of God in their lives — and the disastrous consequences upon them.
May I conclude quoting the words of one of a renowned German theologian as food for thought who said "for every human problem, there is a spiritual element in it." I pray that the leadership of our nation reconsider and refrain from using the word secular for our State and perhaps coin another appropriate term to include the religious and spiritual aspects and truths of our being.
Rev. AISAKE KUNANITU
Nasinu


---------------

6. Religion

(1) The People of Fiji acknowledge the significant role of religion in the modern history   and development of Fiji and the importance of personal faith in building meaningful lives.

(2) Religious liberty, as recognised in the Bill of Rights, is a founding principle of the  State.

(3) Religious belief is personal. Therefore, religion and the State are separate, which means  the State must treat all religions equally; 

(b) the State must not dictate any religious belief;

(c) no State organ may prefer or advance, by any means, any particular religion, religious denomination, religious belief, or religious practice over another, or over any non-religious belief; and

(d) no person may assert any religious belief as a legal reason to disregard this Constitution or any other law.

1 comment:

Steve Finnell said...

SECULARISTS AND THEIR VIEW OF HISTORY

Did you ever notice that secularists accept historical writings as fact, unless they are about God the Father, God the Son and the Holy Spirit.

Have you ever heard a secularist proclaim that the following men did not live and that they were not who historians said they were?
Confucius 551-479 B.C.
Plato 427-347 B.C.
Alexander the Great 356-323 B.C.
Julius Caesar 100-44 B.C.
Socrates 469-399 B.C.
Buddha 563-483 B.C.
Ludwig van Beethoven 1770-1827
Homer 700-800 B.C.
Isaac Newton 1642-1727
Galileo Galilei 1564-1642
Leonardo da Vinci 1452-1519
Marco Polo 1254-1324
John Locke 1632-1704
George Washington 1732-1799
Abraham Lincoln 1809-1865

Secularists do not question the historical fact, that these men lived and died. They do not deny the role these men played in history. They believe this, by faith, that the historical accounts are accurate.


Secularists do deny the historical accuracy of the Bible and all other accounts that proclaim Jesus as the Son of God. They deny the historical accounts of God the Father resurrecting Jesus from the grave.

THE RESULTS OF A SELECTIVE VIEW OF HISTORICAL FACTS.(2 Thessalonians 1:8-9 dealing out retribution to those who do not know God and to those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus. 9 These will pay the penalty of eternal destruction, away from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power.)

SECULARISTS HAVE FAITH IN MEN!
CHRISTIANS HAVE FAITH IN GOD!

(Scripture from: NEW AMERICAN STANDARD BIBLE)

YOU ARE INVITED TO FOLLOW MY CHRISTIAN BLOG. http://steve-finnell.blogspot.com